<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Practical Health Insurance &#187; Public Helath Care</title>

<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://practicalhealthinsurance.net/wp-content/plugins/icanlocalize-translator-tb/css/language_selector.css?ver=2" type="text/css" media="all" />
	<atom:link href="http://practicalhealthinsurance.net/tag/public-helath-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practicalhealthinsurance.net</link>
	<description>Where Health Insurance Becomes Affordable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 15:16:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Employer Sponsored Health Care &#8211; Not that good</title>

<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://practicalhealthinsurance.net/wp-content/plugins/icanlocalize-translator-tb/css/language_selector.css?ver=2" type="text/css" media="all" />
		<link>http://practicalhealthinsurance.net/health-news/employer-sponsored-health-care-not-that-good/</link>
		<comments>http://practicalhealthinsurance.net/health-news/employer-sponsored-health-care-not-that-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Avatar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Helath Care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalhealthinsurance.net/health-news/employer-sponsored-health-care-not-that-good/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Insurance analysts are saying that the government should not rely so heavily on employer sponsored health care benefits for it makes no economic sense. They also continue on by saying that the problem with such complacency is not economical but purely political and that a centralized health care system would be a better choice than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://practicalhealthinsurance.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/employer.jpg' title='employer.jpg'><img src='http://practicalhealthinsurance.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/employer.thumbnail.jpg' alt='employer.jpg' /></a>Insurance analysts are saying that the government should not rely so heavily on employer sponsored health care benefits for it makes no economic sense. They also continue on by saying that the problem with such complacency is not economical but purely political and that a centralized health care system would be a better choice than to continue on with false beliefs. Health care for employees is one of the most costly expenses American companies can do without freeing up the resources tied down by these programs allows them to be more competitive not only at home but globally. It also makes sense to have to deal with just one entity rather than the hundreds if not thousands of carriers around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://practicalhealthinsurance.net/health-news/employer-sponsored-health-care-not-that-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

